What matters most to BP

This’ll fix things:

As for BP, it has taken steps to beef up its PR operation, in an attempt to limit the damage to its reputation. The company has recruited as head of the firm’s US media relations Anne Womack-Kolton, the former press secretary to Dick Cheney.

from this morning’s UK Guardian

True, the company’s public relations since the explosion have been terrible: suppressing and lying about things that will become known eventually anyway, and ridiculous efforts to play down the seriousness of the oil spill. Tony Hayward, BP CEO, “told Fox News sister network Sky News on Tuesday [May 18] that he is largely unconcerned:

I think the environmental impact of this disaster is likely to be very, very modest. It is impossible to say and we will mount, as part of the aftermath, a very detailed environmental assessment as we go forward. We’re going to do that with some of the science institutions in the U.S. But everything we can see at the moment suggests that the overall environmental impact of this will be very, very modest.

After BP has squandered any potential public credibility, the most silver-tongued revolving-door lobbyist-cum-government appointee (such as Ms. Womack-Kolton) will be hard pressed to reverse the tide. We all know which tide they really truly care most about, when it comes to the tide of financial-world and public opinion, vs. the tide of oil.

Young heron dying, SM.jpg

Young heron dying in oil-soaked marsh. Photo by GERALD HERBERT / AP. Copyright by photographer and AP, not used with permission.

Attack of the mourning cloak butterfly larvae

That title sounds contradictory, doesn’t it? Butterflies are beautiful, innocuous, always to be protected. If only the world were as Walt Disney told us it was! [NOTE: I’ve learned from readers of this post that this caterpillar has a toxic substance in its hairs or spines that can cause a very painful reaction if you touch it, so be careful—indeed of any hairy or spiny caterpillar. See below,  https://nosleepingdogs.wordpress.com/2010/06/01/attack-of-the-mourning-cloak-butterfly-larvae/#comment-40639  and https://nosleepingdogs.wordpress.com/2010/06/01/attack-of-the-mourning-cloak-butterfly-larvae/#comment-40872 ]

The first title of this post was “Attack of the tent caterpillars”, because of what I saw. First the caterpillars,

TentCaterpillar3Damage2.jpg

then their “tent”. The black balls visible are probably frass (caterpillar excrement). A few caterpillars are under the tent; some species retire periodically to their tent for protection from the elements and birds.

TentCaterpillar3Tent.jpg

The closer I looked the uglier they were to me.

TentCaterpillarsStem.jpg

They were chowing down on the leaves of our little grove of aspens, planted a few years ago and much cherished.

TentCaterpillarAlders.jpg

Birds, including 6 pairs of nesting tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor), usually keep insect pests under control around our house. But nobody showed any interest in this concentration of food on the aspens; too spiky, or maybe bad-tasting. Caterpillars eat so much so fast, they can defoliate trees. I went looking for something to spray them with and found we had no insect spray. Finally I used 409 cleaning spray, it certainly smells toxic. The next day most of the caterpillars were still alive and eating. Finally a better idea occurred: cut off the branches they were on and bag them up. Since the infestation had spread to just 3 branches, I was able to do that.

It was only afterwards that I succeeded in identifying the caterpillars. I had looked at all the so-called “tent caterpillars”, and others, without finding anything that matched. Then there they were: they would have grown up to be mourning cloak butterflies (Nymphalis antiopa).

MourningCloak.jpg

Photo from milesizz on flickr.

You can imagine how bad I felt. I’ve since thought that maybe I could have cut the branches and then lodged them in among the branches of some other tree. Or kept some and fed them until they pupated. The favored food trees for the larvae are elm, willow, hackberry, and trees of the genus Populus: cottonwood, poplar, birch, and, yes, aspen. Except for occasional cottonwoods and shrubby willow along the river, none of these are native around here. But we do see the occasional mourning cloak, one of which must have laid the eggs earlier this spring—this species overwinters as adults, emerges to mate and lay eggs in spring, then after 10 days or so the caterpillars hatch out, eat, pupate and emerge as butterflies before fall. Given how much caterpillars eat, harvesting enough willow from the riverbanks to keep them fed doesn’t sound practical, at least not for very many individuals. But if there is a next time I think I will try it.

Here are a few closeups of the caterpillars. Identification was hard, maybe because they go through 5 “instars” or stages, shedding their skins each time and so perhaps different instars look a bit different. Some of the photos of this species showed much hairier-looking caterpillars, whereas the ones here were extremely spiny but with few hairs.

TentCaterpillarCloseup1.jpg

TentCaterpillarCloseup.jpg

Note the red dots on the back, and the red legs (arrows).

CaterpillarLegs.jpg

The eggs would have looked like this.

MourningCloakEggs.jpg

Photo from Canadian Biodiversity Information Facility. For an excellent series of photos showing a female laying eggs, changes in the eggs as they get close to hatching, and the tiny new caterpillars, see this backyardnature.com page by Bea Laporte.

And each spiky black voracious caterpillar, after eating its fill of the tender leaves of our aspens, would have toddled off to some sheltered place to pupate, making a chrysalis like this.

Mourning Cloak Chrysalis2.jpg

Photo from bugwood.org.

Since mourning cloak adults overwinter, they are one of the earliest butterflies to appear, and regarded as a sign of spring. The “mourning cloak” refers to their dominant wing color, dark rusty red bordered with black—though it’s lightened with blue jewels and cream-colored edges.

MourningCloack4.jpg

I’ll close this tale of butterflies-never-to-be, with a melancholy ballad in which the mourning cloak appears, perhaps in the role of one of the Greek Furies, haunting one who has done wrong. Usually such messengers of vengeance and doom have unpleasant appearances, as did the Furies, but to the guilty heart a bright butterfly might be even more menacing than a dark spiky caterpillar.

The Mourning Cloak
(Karah Stokes/Spruce and Maple Music 1)

One fair morning late in June
The sun shone on the daisies white
When a messenger of sorrow deep
Came into my garden bright

Wings of deepest velvet black
Bound with gold and sapphires rare
A butterfly, a Mourning Cloak,
Like one a wealthy widow’d wear

He promised me a golden ring
But he gave it to a rich man’s child
He craved the ease wealth would bring
Above a love both true and wild

So I called him to our trysting place
“Since there’s no help, let’s kiss and part”
He took me in a sweet embrace
And he felt a penknife in his heart

He looked at me with fading eyes
I left him there as he left me
The dawn next morning brought the news
That he’d been set upon by thieves

Oh, butterfly, why do you haunt?
Know you the secret in my breast?
I pierced his heart as he pierced mine
I slew the one I loved the best

One fair morning late in June
The sun shone on the daisies white
When a messenger of sorrow deep
Came into my garden bright

swoosh.jpg

Indian Paintbrush and Elegant Cat’s Ears

Today I revisited the Indian Paintbrush mentioned in my last post, to check it for diagnostic features of the species that it seemed most likely to be, Castilleja applegatei (Applegate’s Indian paintbrush, wavyleaf Indian paintbrush). Is this obsessive behavior? Maybe, but harmless. And I like it that trying to identify the plants we photograph makes me take a much closer look at them.

Castilleja with hand.jpg

According to the Lady Bird Johnson Wildflower Center, there are 46 species of Castilleja known as “paintbrush” that are native to North America, and 17 are found in Oregon. The beauty above probably is wavyleaf Indian paintbrush, Castilleja applegatei; the wavy leaves are clearly visible in the photo, and it fits in other respects although different online sources vary on fine points. Is it the upper leaves that are often three-lobed, or the lower ones? Well, at first the narrow leaves of our plant seemed to have no lobes at all but when I uncurled the tip of an upper leaf, there were indeed three lobes.

Castilleja leaf.jpg

Lower leaves had no lobes.

The stickiness of flower and/or leaves that some describe was not evident today, but the flower is older and perhaps has dried out a bit. The flower and leaves are covered with tiny silvery hairs.

Castilleja hairs.jpg

Many Castilleja species are root-parasites, connecting to the roots of nearby grasses or forbs. They can live either independently or as parasites (a capability which makes them “hemi-parasites”) but naturally they grow faster and bigger when receiving some nutrients from a host plant. The individual in our pictures is small, perhaps because nothing much is growing near it to parasitize.

Castilleja wide view.jpg

The small whitish flowers to the right are elegant cat’s ears, Calochortus elegans; we’ve seen more of this species this year than ever in the 14 years we’ve lived here.

Elegant Cat's Ear Bud.jpg

The Pacific Bulb Society’s site has 8 pages of photos and descriptions of Calochortus species; well worth browsing as this genus of lilies is notable for stunning flowers.

Elegant Cat's Ear from above.jpg

Some wildflower identification resources for the non-botanist

In working to identify wildflowers that we’ve photographed, I’ve found several good sites. (Having never studied botany, I’d have to learn a lot in order to key them out, so these are all strictly amateur identifications based on our field guides and information on the web. But I do go beyond simply looking for flowers that resemble what we’ve seen; I try to examine all the species found in our area, compare foliage, habitat, and prominent flower features such as stamen color.)

One site I recommend, especially for flowers of the Pacific Northwest, is Turner Photographics Wildflowers, where “[o]ver 7,000 wildflower photographs by Mark Turner are available… as stock photography…” While one may not reproduce the photos without permission/payment—this is how Mr. Turner makes his living, so respect that— they are a great resource because he has enabled the user to search by flower color, flower type, genus, and family. You can also browse photos by the month in which they were taken.

turner.jpg

“The photos were created throughout the Pacific Northwest and in other parts of the United States and Canada. Most are from locations in Washington or Oregon. Every plant pictured is identified by Latin and common name.” Since many wildflowers have wide ranges, you may find this site helpful even if you’re flower-watching in another part of the US or Canada. And just browsing these fine photographs is really a pleasure.

Moreover, each species has a range map, links to more information such as the USDA’s site, and a summary description:

Turner2.jpg

The CalPhotos site at UC Berkeley has a lot of photographs, “251,866 photos of plants, animals, fossils, people, and landscapes from around the world”. Once you’ve got a genus or species in mind, you can often find a variety of photos here to compare. For Indian paintbrush, Castilleja genus, there are 677 photos (there are 46 species native to North America, and 17 native to Oregon, according to one source). The photos are arranged by species

However, in a tradeoff for the size of this image database, the identifications are those provided by the photographers. “We cannot guarantee the accuracy of the identifications of the plants in this collection of photos. Many of these photos have been contributed by native plant enthusiasts who were not trained as botanists. Occasionally we discover that the plant in a photo has been incorrectly identified by the photographer, though usually the genus is correct. Typically identifications at the genus level are fairly reliable for this database. Nevertheless, mistakes do occur.” And the photos are copyright by their original photographers.

I used all three of these resources linked to above, trying to identify which Indian paintbrush we saw on May 22.

Castilleja .jpg

But I’m still not confident. We’re going back for another look tomorrow. Does it have the “sticky foliage and inflorescence” that Turner says Castilleja applegatei has? Stay tuned.