Low tide at the Oregon Coast

OregonTidepool1.jpg

There was an unusually low tide last week, minus 2 to 2.5 feet, and we went over June 22nd to go tidepooling. Our destination was Gold Beach, on the rocky southern coast of Oregon, and our tidepooling was at Myers Rocks about 7 miles south of Gold Beach. We hoped to see nudibranchs, commonly called sea slugs––a canard, since many are so elegant and beautiful. [See Oregon nudibranch photos by others: 1, 2, 3, 4, several species, video.] But those are mostly found further north. We did see lots of sea stars, anemones, and smaller creatures, as well as a dead sea lion that had been washed up.

AnemoneGiantGreen.jpg

I posted a set of about 50 photos to a gallery on mobileme.com but was frustrated in being unable to add long enough captions, so I am using some of the photos, in smaller form, here with comments, our best efforts at identification, and a few photos found online. On mobileme I recommend using the “mosaic” viewing option from among those at the bottom of the screen; this will show thumbnails at the right, and you can click on any one to see it full-size, then either return to the mosaic view or continue in slideshow form.

Traces in the sand

The receding tide left most stretches of sand flat and smooth as can be; other places, where the water swirled out past rocks, had wonderful ripple patterns. And then there was this odd thing sticking up like a soft-serve “ice cream” serving.

UFO sand castle1.jpg

UFO sand castle2.jpg

It was about about 10 inches tall, surrounded only by flat sand. Must have been an alien sand castle, and the builders left no tracks.

Other tracks were seen.

SandTrack.jpg

A few of the barnacle-covered rocks bore odd sandy structures, sometimes in a ring shape.

SandWithRoots1.jpg

Something held this together, but what?

SandWithRoots2.jpg

I did come across (but took no photos of) one that had crumbled a bit and when I examined a chunk it was still puzzling; mostly sand, with occasional fragile vertical rootlike things, connected to one another minimally if at all. Drawn away by things my naked eye could better appreciate, I didn’t examine this more closely but I hope someone may tell me more. There are some questions google can’t answer: googling “odd clumps of sand with rootlike things” doesn’t get much result. But of course a marine biologist, hearing that vague description, could immediately give me some likely candidates, and by asking a few more questions, probably identify it decisively. Score one for the human brain.

Sea Roaches, Barnacles, and Sea Stars

On another barnacled rock we found a scuttling little creature that made me think of a cockroach, and indeed turns out to be a Sea Roach or Rock Louse (perhaps the species Western Sea Roach, Ligia occidentalis). [Our identifications are the best we could do in a couple of hours at home, comparing our memories and photos with our field guides, including Ricketts & Hedgepeth, and also searching online, but they are open to revision. Leave a comment if you have suggestions or more information, please.]

RockLouse.jpg

There were Acorn Barnacles (a large group of species, barnacles without stalks)

AcornBarnacles2.jpg

and Gooseneck Barnacles, among Blue Mussels

GoossneckBarnacles.jpg

The most numerous creatures were Sea Stars, Pisaster ochraceus, generally known as the purple ochre star or ochre star (comes in brown, orange, and purple) and anemones, mostly Giant Green Anemones, Anthopleura xanthogrammica, which get their bright coloration from symbiotic, single-celled algae living within them.

SeaStars&anemones.jpg

Sea Stars get stiff and hard when the tide goes out, but their flexibility is evident from how they shape themselves to the rock.

OchreSeaStarsClustering.jpg

The mouth of the Sea Star is in the center, on the underside (oral side); it eats by everting its stomach through the mouth, enveloping and digesting its prey; it can pry open shellfish like clams with the hydraulically powered “suckers” or tube feet on its strong arms. The creatures inside the whelk shells being held next to the mouth, below, may be today’s lunch. Sea Stars themselves are a preferred food for sea otters.

OchreSeaStarUnderside.jpg

Closer view of the tube feet.

SeaStarCloseupTubeFeet.jpg

Below, a closeup of the top side of a Sea Star; this is the aboral side, “away from the mouth”. (Not a typo for “arboreal”!) The white things are the so-called spines though they are just little nubbins really. More about Sea Stars, 1, 2.

SeaStarCloseupTopside.jpg

Mollusks and others

Here’s a chiton, perhaps Katharina tunicata (Black leather chiton), about 1.5 inches long. Its familiars, whoever they may be, have nicknamed it “Black Katy”; knowing this, you too can be on casual terms with a mollusk!

Chiton.jpg

These are primitive creatures, protected by overlapping segments of shell that flex enough so that they can move over uneven rocks and even curl up into a ball. Most eat algae that they scrape off the rocks beneath them using a radula, a hard sawtoothed band also found in predatory marine snails and squid. The Pacific Northwest is home to the world’s largest chiton, the Gumboot Chiton, up to 13 inches long and red as a brick. Wikipedia tells us that chitons were eaten by Native Americans, prepared like abalone: beat the large “foot” part until it is somewhat tenderized.

The wormlike thing (above and to the left of the chiton) is unidentified; our research turned up lots of possibilities, including some types that run 90 feet in length and maybe twice that (thus perhaps being longer than a blue whale!), but no way to tell for sure.

Another more familiar mollusk is the whelk. When you find whelk shells not firmly attached to rocks, they usually are empty ones that have been taken over by hermit crabs, but we found this one that had come loose but still had its original inhabitant. The visible part is the foot that mollusks use to attach themselves.

Whelk.jpg

The bright red-orange creature below (we saw only one) is, we think, Ophlitaspongia pennata (Red encrusting sponge). Sometimes found with it is “a well-camouflaged little red nudibranch (Rostangea pulchra) on it or Rostangea’s red spiral eggcase”. But we didn’t see those.

Ophlitaspongia pennata (Red encrusting sponge).jpg

Plant life revealed by the low tide

Sea Grass,

seagrass.jpg

Kelp (actually not plants but algae, see below)

kelp1.jpg

an unidentified vining sand plant,

pinkSandFlower.jpg

and Sea Palms (Potelsia palmaeformis).

seaPalms.jpg

These Sea Palms, enlarged here, actually looked like silhouetted seabirds when I took the picture. Only when I enlarged it on the computer did I see what they really were. Wikipedia tells more: “Potelsia is a genus of kelp. There is only one species, P. palmaeformis. It is found along the western coast of North America, on rocky shores with constant waves. It is one of the few algae that can survive and remain erect out of the water; in fact it spends most of its life cycle exposed to the air. It is an annual, and edible, though harvesting of the alga is discouraged.” This made me look further, since if I ever knew that seaweeds were algae, I had forgotten. On algae, the Big W says “Algae, singular alga, (Latin for “seaweeds”), are a large and diverse group of simple, typically autotrophic organisms, ranging from unicellular to multicellular forms. The largest and most complex marine forms are called seaweeds. They are photosynthetic, like plants, and “simple” because they lack the many distinct organs found in land plants. For that reason they are currently excluded from being considered plants.” So, all that explains why these seaweedy things were up so high––the tide was low, but not so low that these seapalms would have been normally submerged, and I wondered about that. And now you know that if you want to call somebody really simple, you’d better liken him to an alga rather than a potato.

Birds and mammals

The bigger offshore rocks are nesting grounds for various sea birds, but none came near us. We were passed by a group of enthusiastic sea bird researchers in chest-high waders and rubber boots, off to climb one of the rocks and poke into nest burrows,

researchers.jpg

and later that afternoon we saw many Brown Pelicans, either on their way along the shoreline, or actually circling and diving for fish. Cormorants came for the fish too, riding the swells farther out than the diving pelicans, until they saw what they wanted. Also in the afternoon, as we walked and looked for agates (pretty rocks collected, many; agates, 3), we watched two seals close inshore, looked like a mother and youngster. All of these were beyond range of our cameras, but wonderful to see. It was sunny, hardly windy at all, and pleasurable to alternate between having warm bare feet above the surf line, and then chasing the churn of retreating sea-polished rocks and getting caught by knee-high icy waves.

WARNING: Next are several scenic photos, then a section of pictures I took of the dead sea lion we found on the beach as we left. If you do not want to see these, stop at the picture of the sunset.

CynNearRocks.jpg

Gravity has its way with an anemone, when the water is not there to support it.

SeaStarAnemoneSagging.jpg

Another thing I learned while writing this, and as a logophile I found my ignorance embarrassing, is that there is no such word as anenome. I thought maybe anenomes were the flowers and anemones were the sea animals with toxic stingers, but anenome is as non-existent a word as George W.’s “nucular”. These,

800px-Anemone_coronaria_L_1.jpg

and these,

Anemone-Hakusanitige.jpg

are anemones too, land plants rather than marine animals: Anemone coronaria (top) and Anemone narcissiflora (bottom) Photos from Wikimedia Commons.

SunsetOcean.jpg

Steller Sea Lion, Eumetopias jubatus, dead on the beach

StellerSeaLionDead1.jpg

This sea lion bore several wounds that could have been the result of shotgun slugs––ocean fishermen resent the voracious consumption of salmon and other species by sea lions. In recent years, both this species and the California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) have gotten lots of bad ink and acrimony for their opportunistic predation on salmon when the fish bunch up at the dams on the Columbia River, on their way to reproduce and die. Of course the losses to sea lions are miniscule compared to the damage caused over the past century by overfishing, dams blocking rivers, and habitat destruction from logging (which damages fish breeding habitat in various ways including erosion that silts up rivers and streams).

We also thought these might be wounds made by sea gulls pecking their way in to eat what is, for a bird, a huge miraculous mountain of meat. But a fish and wildlife guy that we talked to later said the carcasses must be “pretty ripe” and rotten before a gull can pierce the thick skin. We wanted the f & w people to know, partly in case these were bullet wounds, and the man we talked to said they would send someone down with a metal detector. Both species of sea lion are protected by law.

This was a sad thing to see, especially if the death was caused by humans. If the animal had been alive we would of course have gotten it whatever help and protection we could. But it was too late for that, and what we were left with was an unusual opportunity for a close look. So what follows is not ghoulish or callous, though it may be unpleasant viewing for some.

The Steller Sea Lion is quite different in appearance from the California Sea Lion. The former has a blocky head and thick neck. The latter is sleeker, more gracile, with a slender muzzle, and is the model of what we think of when we hear the phrase “trained seal” although of course “true” seals––such as harbor seals––don’t have the ability to rotate their hind legs forward and “walk on all fours” that a “trained seal” demonstrates. True seals have to lunge and wriggle, on land; sea lions actually walk. Steller Sea Lion males may reach lengths of 11 feet and weigh 600-1100 kg (1300-2500 lbs). This specimen (sex unknown) was only about 6 feet long. The photo below shows the small external ear which is a distinguishing feature of the group of species known variously as eared seals, fur seals, or sea lions (Otariidae).

StellerSeaLionDeadEar.jpg

The closed eye, the lid of which appears swollen and damaged, is at left; the little comma-shaped ear is in the upper right.

StellerSeaLionDeadBack.jpg

Above, a view from the back shows one of the large holes. There were 5 holes visible. It seemed to us that none were close enough together to be wounds from the teeth of some big sea-lion-eating predator, such as an orca. Large areas of orange-ish skin are visible where the fur is gone, perhaps worn off by rubbing against the sandy bottom. The animal’s tiny tail can be seen between the two rear flippers. I took some close-ups of the claws visible on these flippers:

StellerSeaLionDeadClaw1.jpg

and here, on the other rear flipper, which was more damaged .

StellerSeaLionDeadClaw2.jpg

I found it hard to appreciate what they might have looked like in life, but was able to find a great photo online taken through the glass at the Sea Life Center in Seward, Alaska.

SeaLionFLipper.jpg

It was still hard for me to visualize the use of these claws, since they do not stick out past the end of the flippers, nowhere near. But here’s another great photo of an aquarium sea lion scratching, from flickr, and you can see how the flexible flipper can fold to allow the claws to stick out and scratch that itch. I cropped the photo to zoom in on the flipper. I think this is a California Sea Lion, based on the narrower snout.

SeaLionScratching.jpg

Finally, the front flipper of the Steller Sea Lion found dead near Myers Rocks.

StellerSeaLionDeadFrontFlipper.jpg

To end on a less somber note, there is a protected set of offshore rocks, called Rogue Reef Rocky Shore Area, about ten miles north of where we were: “More than 1,800 threatened Steller sea lions (45% of Oregon state total) use this reef, forming the largest pupping site for this species in the U.S., south of Alaska. Over 300 harbor seals are also found here. Approximately 4,000 common murres and more than 500 Brandt’s cormorants nest here” too.

In fact,

These rocks are part of the Oregon Islands National Wildlife Refuge which includes all of the state’s coastal rocks, reefs and islands (a total of 1,853) and two headland areas and spans 320 miles of the Oregon coast. All of the island acreage is designated National Wilderness, with the exception of 1-acre Tillamook Rock and Lighthouse, and public access is closed, to protect the birds and marine mammals.

Thirteen species of seabirds nest on this refuge [along the length of the state], including Common Murres, Tufted Puffins, Leach’s and Fork-tailed Storm-petrels, Rhinoceros Auklets, Brandt’s, Pelagic and Double-crested cormorants, and Pigeon guillemots. Harbor seals, California sea lions, Steller sea lions and Northern elephant seals use refuge lands for breeding and haulout areas. [Source]

Can elephants really paint?

I found a link somewhere to a YouTube video of a young Asian elephant painting quite a good outline picture showing an elephant holding a flower in its trunk. It is impressive to see, but I found it hard to believe the implication: that this elephant was creating, rather than performing a learned task. As a former zookeeper and continuing student of animal intelligence I’m well aware of how various animal species can display amazing “intelligence” and problem-solving skills. And I’m equally aware of how we can misinterpret the actions of animals: we are blind to demonstrations of the real “intelligence” that animals use in their lives, but seize upon actions that remind us of ourselves.

We must keep in mind that we are the ones defining “intelligence”: it’s very specific to human concerns, sometimes even cultural distinctions and values. We don’t even count as intelligence the mental activity displayed, say, by a social hunter like a wolf or lioness who uses its knowledge of prey behavior, local topography, and the expected reactions of its hunting partners, to set up successful hunts of prey which may be much larger, faster, and part of a distracting herd. What we like to see, what we (naturally) respond to, are actions that mimic our own activities. To impress us, the mimicry must even be culturally appropriate. If I try to teach my dog to sing and he makes sounds like a Tuvan throat-singer I probably won’t think the venture a success, but if he sounds like Caruso or Elvis, that’s a different matter.

Also, animals can appear to perform complicated volitional acts which may be done simply by rote or mimicry. You may teach a dog to perform an operatic aria, or to mimic you when you dance, but the meaning invested in the act, and the amount of creativity or self-expression involved may not be at all what you (would like to) believe it is. A few animals have become famous for applying their acute powers of observation of human gesture, stance and expression; their masters guided them without being at all aware of having done so. Clever Hans, the horse who solved arithmetic problems and tapped out the answers with his hoof, is the pre-eminent example; when his guileless owner was blocked off from view of the horse, or did not know the answer himself, then Hans could hear the questions but was completely unable to tap out any correct responses. It appears that the horse read his owner’s body language, not that the man intentionally cued him. If the owner knew that 9 hoof-taps was the answer to “What is 3 times 3?” then his body relaxed after the ninth tap and the horse reacted to that.

So when we think we see an animal performing a complex activity (such as painting representational pictures), and one which has no apparent functional place in its normal life, we need to set aside our amazement and delight and look deeper.

It appears that the elephant video was made in an elephant camp in Thailand, perhaps at ChengMai where elephants have been trained in drawing and painting for over a decade, or at a newer camp called Mateman Elephant Camp. At Chengmai, the paintings are sold or exchanged for donations which help support the elephant center. The use of elephants in Asian logging is declining, and of course truly wild habitat where elephants won’t come into conflict with humans is scarce or nonexistent there. So the financial return from tourists is probably a positive thing, and painting may provide some stimulating activity for the elephants themselves although their greatest natural need is for more active pursuits such as walking many miles daily, uprooting bushes and trees, searching for water, learning and remembering their territory, and so on.

The photo below, from a 1995 issue of the Chengmai Mail, shows elephants in front of their largest painting to that time, a 12m mural made to raise money for a children’s fund.

elephantpaintingschool.jpg

But what is the elephant in the video actually doing? How much direction might the elephant be getting from his keeper or mahout? The video’s close focus on the animal did not offer any view of the mahout, who might have been giving verbal cues or making gestures.

Is the elephant painting a picture which it has composed and chosen or one which it is copying or has learned? A clue to this does appear in the video: near the end after the elephant has painted the red flower, the camera draws back and we can see an attendant removing a finished painting of very similar flowers from an easel near the elephant. To me, this indicates the likelihood of rote performance. The trainer has schooled the elephant: he hands the elephant a brush with red paint on it and says “Flower now,” while someone holds up a board with flower paintings on it, and the elephant responds. Even that act shows “intelligence,” and certainly trainability, but it would not demonstrate that the elephant is making the multiple choices, conscious and subconscious, made by a human artist.

There weren’t any videos I could find of elephants just learning to paint at ChengMai, but those in US zoos who’ve been given paintbrushes have consistently turned out paintings that can definitely be called “non-representational.”

The fullest account I found of the training of the elephants to paint was at the blog Stranger in a Strange Land in the March 14, 2008 post. It indicates pretty intensive training of the elephants.

“Teaching an elephant to paint is like teaching a young child,” says Tossapol Petcharattanakool, an art instructor at Maesa and professionally trained as an elementary school art teacher. “They have a sense of form and style and can learn positioning of lines. But while the elephant IS the painter, there is definitely communication, collaboration between mahout and elephant.”

In addition, at a site that sells the elephants’ paintings, I found indications that individual elephants repeat the same work.

There’s a photo of an “elephant with flowers” painting very much like the one made on the video, but with two flowers instead of one, and underneath,

Product Information

This is the last “Self Portrait” in stock – our allotment for May/June from Elephant Artist Hong.

Thanks to Anchalee Kalmapijit, director of the Mateman Elephant Camp and now director of an new Elephant Art enclave, we were able to obtain several of these Elephant Self Portraits made famous first by the documentary made by Blink TV with Vanda Harvey – an English Artist which was featured on the BBC and then the video posted on YouTube.

According to Anchalee, now is the rainy season in northern Thailand which makes it difficult for the Elephant Artists to paint in the open. Couple that with the decision by Anchalee and Hong’s handler Noi to “relax” and paint at a pace more set by Hong’s “mood”, and one can understand the scarcity of these paintings in the elephant art market. These paintings have sold as fast as we post them so order NOW! There is NO video with this painting.

PS Check out other sites that carry self portraits by Hong – they sell for a lot more than this!

That gives me enough evidence to conclude, until I learn differently, that the elephants are “merely” reproducing movements they have been taught. The degree of consistency is so great (in these few examples I’ve seen) that the trainers may even guide the animal’s trunk in the beginning, to teach it the desired lines and curves. Later the trainer gives verbal commands indicating which set of lines to draw. The elephants are not, say, looking over at another elephant and drawing lines with a brush to depict what they see.

The more we learn about natural animal behavior the richer and more complex we see that it is. If elephants or chimpanzees are unable to paint original representational pictures, that does not diminish them. The delight we feel when animals act like people is deeply selfish: “Look, it can hold a bat and hit a ball with it!” It’s imitating a human, that pinnacle of creation! Homage to humanity from the lesser beings.

Much more interesting are the things they can do that arise from their “essence,” their way of interacting with the world. But few of us ever get to observe at length any animals that are not living in a human-designed world; our pets, our livestock, our zoo animals, all act within the limits of a man-made environment. Even in that environment we can get glimpses of essence, of dog-ness or penguin-ness, if we pay attention and are resistant to self-serving interpretations.

Keeping deer out of the garden

Deer love tender new leaves and can leap tall fences at a bound. We see them all the time, on our rural property outside the fenced area where the dogs have free range. But we’ve never had one get into our vegetable garden which is bordered on the back by that main fence, and on the other three sides by fences to keep our dogs out. The fences are well under five feet tall, nothing for a deer to jump. Our garden is in raised beds about three feet wide and varying in length; between the wooden sides of the beds, the walkways are about two and a half feet wide. My theory is, that deer (like other hoofed animals) are concerned about having good footing when they jump into a place, and the narrow spaces and mixture of heights doesn’t look safe or inviting.

Outside our fence I have been trying for over eight years to get trees and tall plants established in a bare spot to make a visual barrier between us and our neighbor’s two-story place. Poor soil and hot dry weather have been the major problem, but then the deer have chowed down on most everything that I have kept alive except some weeping willows I started by sticking branches in the ground. I’ve tried old remedies, new remedies, and wacky ideas: Mylar pinwheels, hanging scented soap, rotten egg spray, flapping hanging things tied to the trees, systemic bittering agents put in the soil, glittery hanging things like metallic beads, Mylar streamers, and aluminum pie plates (reputed to work to repel birds eating ripening fruit). Never did try hanging little bags of human hair trimmings, a method with a following. I bought dehydrated coyote urine but then on the drive home thought about how it must have been collected, and went back and returned it with an explanation to the wild bird store, and I believe they stopped carrying it. It might have worked, but the confinement needed to produce it was unacceptable.

I went so far as to lay down landscape cloth around the trees and then on top of that peg down that plastic-netting fencing used for temporary barriers. I put it down horizontally: it did a good job of tripping me up all the time but the deer did not seem to be affected. And soon falling leaves covered it, weeds rooted in the decomposed leaves, and it was buried.

Finally I decided to mimic what worked in the garden and I used wide plastic tape, like crime scene tape or the fiberglass tape used on drywall seams, to divide the tree area into many narrow portions. It worked! I put it at varying heights between 2 – 4 feet, going around a tree trunk or stake and then off at an angle to another point. I’ve now moved to using bright yellow polypropylene rope because the tapes didn’t hold up to uv exposure, and the stronger rope is easier for me to get over or under when working out there. Once the trees get tall enough, it can be removed; without some protection, nothing but the original willows will ever get that tall. It’s not too scenic, but I don’t care, and the neighbors–I think they probably prefer it to the flapping plastic trash bags!

Star-nosed mole

“Star-nosed moles” were mentioned in a Richard Wilbur poem I posted recently and I thought some might like to know what these unusual creatures are. But after locating what I thought was the best photo available, I hesitated to put the photo in the same post as the poem; I guess we all have our borderline between “unusual, marvelous” and “grotesque, repugnant” and I don’t want to spoil anyone’s enjoyment of the poem. [Count yourself fortunate if your appreciation of a lofty redwood is not reduced but enhanced by understanding something about the channels that carry water from roots to crown, and sugars and amino acids from leaves to other parts.]

I have to admit that the star-nosed mole does look a bit like a horror-movie alien in this head-on shot: the star-like part is composed of highly sensitive appendages for detecting, evaluating, and grabbing tiny prey in the total darkness of mole-land.

siod_starnosed_mole_04.jpg

Long claws for digging, and 22 appendages ringing the nose in a star-like pattern: it’s a star-nosed mole (Condylura cristata).
Picture from livescience

The Vanderbilt University site has an account of research on just how fast this mole is at detecting, accepting, and devouring his tiny earthworms and other prey (choose “Nature’s fastest forager” from the Story Map menu) and a great short video of a mole emerging to snatch up a hapless worm (choose “Star-nosed mole theater” – “Mole snatch-and-run”).